Why now: how a dated event becomes your opening line

“I'm reaching out because we've built a great warehouse management system” is a sentence about you. It contains your company, your product and your opinion of that product — three things the reader has no view on yet and no reason to form one about. It is not badly written. It is simply off topic, because the topic on the other side is “what is happening here right now, and does anyone understand it”.

“I saw you opened a second warehouse outside Poznań in August” is a sentence about them. There is no judgement in it, only a fact that happened to them, carries a date and was published somewhere. The reader does not have to take it on trust or argue with it — they know, because they did it. The conversation starts from a shared point instead of your introduction.

The difference is not politeness or length. It is that the second sentence can be checked and the first cannot. Checkability is the whole currency here: if you know when something happened and where it is written down, you have earned the right to bring it up. If you do not, all you have left is an adjective — and an adjective in a first line reads like a template sent to a hundred companies, because usually it is one.

So the work happens before the sentence is written, not in the editing of it. A why-now line is the tail end of a chain of reasoning: something happened, it changes this company's situation, and what you sell suddenly has a job to do there. A missing link there is not something rewriting can repair.

1. 01The event. What actually happened, stated with a noun and a verb rather than an impression. “They opened a second warehouse.” “They are hiring four operators.” “There is a new person running finance.” If you cannot say it in one sentence without the word “probably”, you do not have an event, you have a hunch.
2. 02The date. When it happened. The date decides whether the sentence is worth writing at all: the same fact from last week is a reason to talk, and the same fact from two years ago is proof that you have not looked since. It is also the only thing that lets you decide whether to call this week or leave the company alone.
3. 03The source. Where you read it: a page, a job posting, a press release, a register entry. The source does two jobs at once — it lets you verify the fact before you repeat it out loud, and it gives you an answer when someone asks how you know. A line with no source is not research; it is a guess that sounds like research.
4. 04The consequence for the buyer. What the event changes for them, not for you. A second site means two stock positions instead of one. Four new operators mean four people to train on a process that used to live in one person's head. This part is a hypothesis and should sound like one — put as a question, it gives the other side something to correct, and correcting you is already a conversation.

The home page lists eight signal types we look for. Three of them lead to the most natural opening lines, because each one arrives with a consequence already attached — you only have to name it. The examples below describe companies generically and people by role, which is also how every row of an analysis is written.

A new site or facility. “I saw you brought a second warehouse near Poznań online in August — with two sites, picking usually stops fitting in the spreadsheet that handled it fine with one. Is that already a live problem for you, or not yet?” The event is dated, the consequence is an industry observation offered as a question, and your product does not appear in the opening line at all.

Active hiring. “I saw you're hiring a production planner, and the posting mentions shift reports being keyed in from paper. In my experience that line usually means the numbers arrive a day late — is that how it looks on your side?” A job advert is the most literal source there is, because the company describes its own gap in it. You are quoting what they published about themselves, not what you imagined.

A change in the management board. “I saw you've had a new person running operations since June. The first months are usually a review of suppliers and tools — if that review is under way, I'm happy to send over what's worth looking at in this area.” Note what is missing: a name. You write about a role and about a decision that belongs to that role, because the buyer is a company, not a named individual.

The proportions are the same in all three: one sentence about them, one sentence of hypothesis, one short question. Your offer arrives only once the hypothesis has been confirmed — and that is the whole difference between a conversation and a pitch sent to someone who did not ask for one.

A stale event. A signal has a shelf life. A job posting lives as long as it is up, usually a few weeks. A new facility, a board change or a register change gives you roughly a quarter. A public tender expires with its bid deadline. “I saw you're opening a new plant”, written a year after the opening, is worse than saying nothing: it announces that your knowledge of the company is old, and the conversation starts with a correction. That is why the date belongs inside the sentence, not in a note beside it.

An event that is true of the whole industry. “I saw you're digitalising your processes.” “I saw you're growing.” “Costs are rising in your sector.” Those lines can be sent to any company on a list and none of them will notice they were not meant for it. The test is simple: if the same sentence fits the third company on your list without changing a single word, it is not a signal, it is a description of a market. Specificity lives in countable things — the number of sites, the job title in the advert, the change in the register.

A compliment dressed as research. “I've been following your company for a while and I'm impressed by what you're building” contains no fact and pretends to contain work. Readers spot it instantly, because they get sentences like it every week. Real research can be quoted; admiration cannot. If your opening line could be swapped for a compliment without losing information, there was no information in it.

There is a quieter fourth mistake: a line built on a signal that is genuine but unrelated to what you sell. A grant for solar panels is not a reason to talk about a payroll system merely because it is recent. The signal has to reach your offer through a consequence, not through recency alone.

In an analysis, every why-now bullet stores the address of the page it was read from, with a date. The rule is hard: without a source the sentence is never written, so there is no signal you cannot check with one click. The published analysis from 2 Sept 2026 stored 154 signals across 51 companies — you can open it before ordering one of your own. That example page shows the funnel and the scores without source addresses; the link beside each signal sits in the analysis a buyer receives.

What you get, then, is the raw material of an opening line: the event, the date, the source and a proposed consequence. You do not get a finished message. You will also not find a single e-mail address, phone number or personal name in the list — we describe companies and roles, not people, and there is no field where such data could appear. Who to approach, through which channel, and whether to approach at all, stays your decision.

Pursiva sends nothing on your behalf. There are no sequences, no outbox, and no record of who you end up approaching — we hold no data that could carry one. That is deliberate: the contact is your relationship and your responsibility, including the legal part of it. The analysis delivers itself, within an hour of payment, and that is where our part ends.

Frequently asked questions

How long is an event usable as an opening line?

It depends on the type. A public tender runs until its bid deadline, which is sometimes only days away. A job posting lives while it is up, usually a few weeks. A new facility, a board change or a register change gives you roughly a quarter. Funding and grants work longest, because the money is spent in stages. That is a working rule rather than a measurement, which is why every signal carries its date and the judgement stays with you.

Can I name the person who took the new role?

We do not, and no personal names appear in an analysis — we describe the role, because the buyer is the company rather than one individual. “You've had a new person running operations since June” carries exactly the same information as a sentence with a name, without opening the conversation by showing how much you know about someone.

Does Pursiva write and send these messages for me?

No. You get companies, a reason to talk and the source behind every fact. The wording, the channel and the timing are yours — there is no outbox, no sequencing, and no contact data stored about anyone. This piece is about building the opening sentence, not about running outreach.

Read next

• Buying signals
• You get no e-mail addresses and no phone numbers
• Start a run